Sullivan & Cromwell LLP Logo
  • Home
  • Lawyers
  • Practices
  • Insights
  • About
  • Careers
  • Alumni
  • Twitter icon
  • LinkedIn icon
  •  icon
  • Podcasts icon
© 2025 Sullivan & Cromwell LLP
    • Home
    • Lawyers
    • Practices
    • Insights
    • About
    • Careers
    • Alumni
    Home /  Insights /  Video And Podcasts /  Podcast
    Podcasts

    Supreme Court’s Recent Polansky Decision on the False Claims Act

    • Our Lawyers
    • Related Practices
    July 19, 2023

    In this episode of S&C’s Critical Insights, Annie Ostrager and Tracy Richelle High, Co-Heads of S&C’s Labor & Employment Group, discuss the Supreme Court’s June 16 decision in United States ex. rel. Polansky v. Executive Health Resources and implications for qui tam whistleblowers.

    The False Claims Act (FCA) authorizes qui tam actions by private parties, called “relators,” who sue on behalf of the United States. The government may intervene and take over litigating the case during the “seal period”—the window at the outset of the action during which the case is sealed. If the government chooses not to intervene, the relator litigates the action. But the government has a right to intervene later for “good cause.”

    In Polansky, the government chose not to intervene during the seal period, but years later, moved to dismiss the case. The relator argued that the government could not do so because it had not intervened during the seal period. The government responded that it could move to dismiss without intervening at all.

    The Supreme Court adopted neither position. Instead, it held that the government may move to dismiss over a relator’s objection an FCA action so long as it moved to intervene at some point.

    Annie and Tracy note that the qui tam provision of the FCA remains a powerful tool for prosecutors to encourage whistleblowers to come forward.  But a relator’s path to success may seem more uncertain after the Court’s decision.

    Read More
    Stay Updated

    Subscribe to stay current on S&C Insights.

    Our Lawyers

    Our Lawyers

    Ann-Elizabeth Ostrager Headshot Photo
    Ann-Elizabeth Ostrager
    New York
    +1-212-558-7357
    Email
    vCard
    Tracy Richelle High Headshot Photo
    Tracy Richelle High
    New York
    +1-212-558-4000
    Email
    vCard
    Read More

    Related Practices

    • Employment Law
    • Litigation
    • Supreme Court and Appellate
    • Workplace Investigations
    Sullivan & Cromwell LLP Logo
    • Twitter icon
    • LinkedIn icon
    • RSS Feed icon
    • Podcasts icon
    • Home
    • Contact Us
    • Information Policy Relating to Cookies
    • Privacy Policy
    • California Privacy Policy
    • Website Notice
    • Attorney Advertising Notice
    © 2025 Sullivan & Cromwell LLP