In its highly anticipated decision in Unwired Planet v. Huawei, the Supreme Court of the United Kingdom affirmed the decisions of the UK Court of Appeals in Unwired Planet v. Huawei and in Huawei & ZTE v. Conversant. Among other things, the Supreme Court held that: (1) UK courts have jurisdiction to determine a global FRAND license based on the patent owner’s contractual FRAND commitment to a standard-setting organization; (2) UK courts were a proper forum for the determination because the only suggested alternative, China, was not an acceptable alternative; (3) the “non-discrimination” requirement of the FRAND commitment is satisfied by offering a benchmark royalty rate that reflects the fair and reasonable value of the portfolio and does not require licensors to provide all similarly situated licensees the same rate; (4) UK courts may enter injunctions forbidding the use of UK patents if an implementer refuses to accept the court-determined global license FRAND terms; and (5) Unwired Planet did not violate UK competition law by departing from the explicit negotiating steps set out by the Court of Justice of the European Union (“CJEU”) in Huawei v. ZTE.