S&C Critical Insights – Supreme Court Business Review: Ford Motor Co. v. Montana and TransUnion v. RamirezJuly 28, 2021
In the second episode of S&C’s Supreme Court Business Review series, hosts Judd Littleton and Julia Malkina are joined by Bill Monahan, head of the Firm’s Products Liability & Mass Torts Group, to discuss the implications of two important business decisions from the October 2020 Term. In Ford Motor Company v. Montana Eighth Judicial District Court, the Supreme Court gave further guidance on when state courts can exercise specific personal jurisdiction over nonresident defendants. In TransUnion v. Ramirez, the Court addressed the concrete harm requirement for Article III standing in the context of unnamed class members.
S&C’s Supreme Court and Appellate Practice
Led by former Acting Solicitor General of the United States Jeff Wall—who has argued more than 30 times before the U.S. Supreme Court—and drawing on the experience of 13 former U.S. Supreme Court clerks and more than 75 former federal circuit court clerks, S&C’s Supreme Court and Appellate Practice adeptly handles challenging and high-profile appeals around the country. Our Supreme Court and Appellate lawyers collectively have significant experience before the Supreme Court and scores of other federal and state courts of appeals.
S&C’s Litigation Practice
Our Litigation Group draws upon S&C’s deep experience in corporate, financial and transactional law, forming integrated teams that handle any related or follow-on matters that arise. We manage issues through every stage of the litigation life cycle, before any court, arbitration panel or regulatory agency.