Sullivan & Cromwell LLP Logo Sullivan & Cromwell LLP Logo
  • Lawyers
  • Practices
  • Insights
  • About
  • Careers
  • Alumni
  • Twitter icon
  • LinkedIn icon
  •  icon
  • Podcasts icon
© 2026 Sullivan & Cromwell LLP
    • Home
    • Lawyers
    • Practices
    • Insights
    • About
    • Careers
    • Alumni
    Home /  Insights /  Memos and Newsletters /  Memo
    S&C Memos

    Following Fifth Circuit Ruling, the FTC Announces that It Will Accept HSR Filings Using Either the Old or New HSR Form

    Court of Appeals Declines to Stay District Court Order Vacating Expanded Reporting Requirements for Mergers Subject to the Hart-Scott-Rodino Act

    March 20, 2026 | min read |
    • Related Practices

    In 2024, the Federal Trade Commission finalized a rule expanding the scope of information required by the Hart-Scott-Rodino Act Premerger Notification Form.[1] As explained in our earlier note,[2] a federal district court struck down the new rule in February 2026, finding that the FTC exceeded its statutory authority and that the rule was arbitrary and capricious.⁠[3] The district court vacated the rule nationwide.[4]

    On February 18, 2026, the FTC moved the Fifth Circuit for a stay of the district court’s order pending appeal.[5] Plaintiffs, which are represented by Sullivan & Cromwell, opposed the request for a stay (but did not oppose a temporary administrative stay to give the court of appeals time to rule on the motion).[6] On March 19, 2026, the Fifth Circuit summarily denied the FTC’s motion.[7]

    The FTC has advised that it “is now accepting HSR filings using the Form and Instructions that were in place before the February 10, 2025, effective date of the new rule” and “will continue to accept HSR filings made pursuant to the February 10, 2025, Form and Instructions should filers voluntarily decide to submit them.”[8] Sullivan & Cromwell will continue to alert clients of any further developments affecting HSR filings.



    [1] Premerger Notification; Reporting and Waiting Periods Requirements, 89 Fed. Reg. 89,216 (Nov. 12, 2024).

    [2] Sullivan & Cromwell LLP, Federal Court Strikes Down FTC’s Expanded M&A Reporting Requirements (Feb. 17, 2026), /insights/memo/2026/February/Federal-Court-Strikes-Down-FTC-s-Expanded-M-A-Reporting-Requirements.

    [3] Memorandum Opinion & Order, Chamber of Com. of the U.S. v. FTC, No. 6:25-cv-00009 (E.D. Tex. Feb. 12, 2026).

    [4] Id. at 34.

    [5] Opposed Emergency Motion for Stay Pending Appeal, Chamber of Com. of the U.S. v. FTC, No. 26-40094 (5th Cir. Feb. 18, 2026).

    [6] Opposition to Motion for Stay Pending Appeal, Chamber of Com. of the U.S. v. FTC, No. 26-40094 (5th Cir. Feb. 23, 2026).

    [7] Order, Chamber of Com. of the U.S. v. FTC, No. 26-40094 (5th Cir. Mar. 19, 2026).

    [8] Fed. Trade Comm’n, Premerger Notification Program, available at https://www.ftc.gov/enforcement/premerger-notification-program (last visited Mar. 20, 2026).

    Read More
    Stay Updated

    Subscribe to stay current on S&C Insights.

    Related Practices Related Practices

    • Administrative Law
    • Antitrust
    • General Practice
    • Litigation
    • Mergers & Acquisitions
    Sullivan & Cromwell LLP Logo Sullivan & Cromwell LLP Logo
    • Twitter icon
    • LinkedIn icon
    • RSS Feed icon
    • Podcasts icon
    • Contact Us
    • Cookies
    • Privacy & Disclaimers
    • Attorney Advertising
    © 2026 Sullivan & Cromwell LLP