Sullivan & Cromwell LLP Logo Sullivan & Cromwell LLP Logo
  • Lawyers
  • Practices
  • Insights
  • About
  • Careers
  • Alumni
  • Twitter icon
  • LinkedIn icon
  •  icon
  • Podcasts icon
© 2026 Sullivan & Cromwell LLP
    • Home
    • Lawyers
    • Practices
    • Insights
    • About
    • Careers
    • Alumni
    Home /  Insights /  Memos and Newsletters /  Memo
    S&C Memos

    Supreme Court Rules Courts Must Stay, Rather than Dismiss, Cases in Which All Claims Are Subject to Arbitration

    May 17, 2024 | min read |
    • Related Practices

    On May 16, 2024, the Supreme Court in Smith v. Spizzirri clarified one procedural question concerning a U.S. court’s role in compelling parties to arbitrate claims: When a court is faced with a case that is subject to arbitration based on the parties’ written arbitration agreement, should the court stay the case pending arbitration or dismiss the case outright? The Supreme Court unanimously held that the Federal Arbitration Act (FAA) requires courts to stay, rather than dismiss, cases that are subject to arbitration. The decision resolves a federal court circuit split and may make it more difficult to immediately appeal a decision compelling parties to arbitration.

    Read More

    Read More
    Stay Updated

    Subscribe to stay current on S&C Insights.

    Related Practices Related Practices

    • Employment Law
    • International Arbitration and Global Dispute Resolution
    • Litigation
    • Supreme Court and Appellate
    Sullivan & Cromwell LLP Logo Sullivan & Cromwell LLP Logo
    • Twitter icon
    • LinkedIn icon
    • RSS Feed icon
    • Podcasts icon
    • Contact Us
    • Cookies
    • Privacy & Disclaimers
    • Attorney Advertising
    © 2026 Sullivan & Cromwell LLP