Sullivan & Cromwell LLP Logo Sullivan & Cromwell LLP Logo
  • Lawyers
  • Practices
  • Insights
  • About
  • Careers
  • Alumni
  • Twitter icon
  • LinkedIn icon
  •  icon
  • Podcasts icon
© 2026 Sullivan & Cromwell LLP
    • Home
    • Lawyers
    • Practices
    • Insights
    • About
    • Careers
    • Alumni
    Home /  Insights /  Blog: Legal Developments Affecting the Workplace /  Blog Post

    EEOC Rescinds Long-standing Affirmative Action Guidance

    July 2, 2026 | min read
    • Related Practices

    The Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (“EEOC”) has voted to rescind two decades-old documents addressing permissible affirmative action under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964: (i) its 1979 Interpretive Rule, “Affirmative Action Appropriate Under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964,” and (ii) Section 607 of the EEOC’s Compliance Manual, which outlined the agency’s enforcement positions with respect to permissible affirmative action and affirmative action plans.[1] According to the EEOC, the rescission “is consistent with the text of Title VII and Supreme Court precedent.”[2]

    The first rescinded document, the 1979 Interpretive Rule, has served as the EEOC’s roadmap for when private employers may voluntarily adopt affirmative action plans consistent with Title VII. It encouraged employers to conduct a “reasonable self-analysis” of their workforce and permitted reasonable voluntary action where that analysis identified adverse impact, the lingering effects of prior discrimination, or artificially limited applicant or promotion pools.[3]

    The second rescinded document, Section 607 of the EEOC’s Compliance Manual, elaborated on the 1979 guidelines and set out the agency’s enforcement approach to permissible affirmative action plans. The EEOC stated that Section 607 was “made obsolete” in light of the rescission of the 1979 Interpretive Rule.[4]

    The EEOC stated that the documents ran afoul of Title VII and the U.S. Supreme Court’s 2025 decision in Ames v. Ohio Department of Youth Services, in which a unanimous Court held that Title VII requires the same evidentiary standard for all disparate-treatment plaintiffs—regardless of whether they belong to a majority or minority group.[5]

    In light of the rescission, employers should review any voluntary affirmative action plans, DEI-related programs, and other initiatives that consider protected characteristics in employment decisions, and should document the legitimate, non-discriminatory basis for any measures they retain.


    [1] Press Release, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, EEOC Votes to Rescind Affirmative Action Interpretive Guidelines and Related Compliance Manual (June 30, 2026), https://www.eeoc.gov/newsroom/
    eeoc-votes-rescind-affirmative-action-interpretive-guidelines-and-related-compliance
    .

    [2] Id.

    [3] 29 C.F.R. Part 1608.

    [4] EEOC Press Release, supra note 1.

    [5] Id.

    Read More
    BLOG POSTINGS
    Subscribe to receive updates on our latest blog postings.
    RSS
    Recent Blog Posts
    NLRB Division of Advice Reaffirmed Its Current Position That Non-Compete Agreements Do Not Generally Violate the NLRA
    July 14, 2026
    EEOC Rescinds Long-standing Affirmative Action Guidance
    July 2, 2026
    DOJ Issues Opinion on Disparate-Impact Liability
    June 26, 2026
    Updated: Supreme Court to Clarify Which Workers Can Avoid Arbitration
    June 9, 2026

    Related Practices Related Practices

    • Employment Law
    Sullivan & Cromwell LLP Logo Sullivan & Cromwell LLP Logo
    • Twitter icon
    • LinkedIn icon
    • RSS Feed icon
    • Podcasts icon
    • Contact Us
    • Cookies
    • Privacy & Disclaimers
    • Attorney Advertising
    © 2026 Sullivan & Cromwell LLP